Violence and Poverty

Reading chapter 7 from our text this week made me incredible angry at politicians in general. The way Mike Males laid out his argument (that poverty is the root cause of violence) and backed it up with a wealth of evidence and statistics made me angry at the way the issue is being handled by politicians and portrayed by the media. I was also angered by the fact that so much violence and abuse committed against kids is done by adults who are supposed to be the ones in our society with the ability to act responsibly and act on good values. The fact that the media doesn't mention any of this and goes so far as to blame kids and their innate tendency towards violence and misbehavior disgusts me. In this day and age, I thought we were supposed to be a society that values correct information and scorns ignorance, but this article makes me think that people are willing to be force fed any information by a person or organization that seems to have authority over an issue. This article provides an example of a research driven insight into a very serious issue and it is a shame that it is not more widely available to the mass public. If everyone was able to read this article, I think they would share my anger and disgust and take the time to not only look into this one issue with more depth but a whole host of issues that are just as susceptible to misinformation and spin by the media and politicians. This article also makes me want to become more of an advocate for those in poverty because of how it leads to such a large amount of problems beyond those that are the most obvious.

The Social Construction of Adolescence

I thought this article went along very nicely with the Kumashiro article that we read for last week. Specifically, I enjoyed that the author advocated strongly for the rights and best interests of adolescence because it seems that they may be a group that does not have the ability to stand up for themselves and the issues that affect them directly. It was also interesting to me that he took a very close view at how the idea of adolescence was constructed by society and isn't a period of growth that can be simply viewed through a lense of phisiology or psychology. The notion that adults invented the period of development to help them deal with anxieties over sexual issues also intrigued me, especially when considering the fact that it seems adults project their problems onto adolescents instead of working through them on their own. On this point, the article also reminded me of Kumashiro because it called for everyone to rethink and reexamine the system in order to shake it up and benefit the group of people that are being adversely affected by old ways of thinking.

Education and Otherness

Kevin Kumashiro's article, "Toward a Theory of Anti-Oppressive Education", takes the closest look at the "Other", as he calls it, and the implications of the educational environment on the other that I have ever read. I thought this article was very dense in its amount of information (and I don't mean this in a bad way) and explores every possible consideration one may have when it comes to the concept of the "other" in an educational setting. Because this was the case, I ended up having to rethink or reexamine the ways I had previously viewed certain aspects of education. One point he made in particular really struck a chord with me and that is that when we use multicultural literature in a classroom, we should be using it not to have our students simply learn about another type of person's experience, but to use that reading to also deconstruct the hierarchy of power in place between normal and other. He also said that often times reading this multicultural literature and talking about these issues leads to empathy, but that empathy should not be the final goal. Again, it should be to deconstruct the partial knowledge that is in place surrounding those who are othered. Before reading this article, I think I was in the group of people Kumashiro was talking about that only have empathy in mind. I can't feel too bad about this, though, because empathy is a good trait, but, again, not the end all be all in this specific discussion. I now see that I, and we as educators, must go beyond even our good intentions and really seek fundamental change when it comes to how certain groups of people are treated and educated in our schools. And as this article points out, as we try to do this, we will keep coming across more and more considerations and obstacles, but we must not be deterred for the sake of each and every one of our students.